Lemhi River L-52 Removal

Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Acquisition

Fish Passage Improvement Instream Flow Instream Habitat Riparian Habitat Upland Habitat And Sediment Wetland
Project ID011 09 SA
Recovery DomainsSnake River
Start Date07/07/2010
End Date12/31/2012
Year2009
StatusCompleted
Last Edited05/08/2024
 
1 - 1

Description    


Actions completed on this project include: (1) Abandonment of the L-52 irrigation canal that captured water from Lemhi Little Springs before transporting this water a distance of about 7 miles.
(2) Installed a new pressurized sprinkler irrigation system that converts from flood irrigation and conserves water: three pivots, water pumping station, and pipeline that irrigate approximately 88 acres. (3) Upgraded power transmission lines to 3-phase power. (4) Removed three fish passage barriers (2 diversion dams and 1 diversion dam, tarp and rock). The irrigation ditches behind all three diversions were filled in. The removal of the diversions increased access for a total of 4.5 miles: L52 – 0.3 miles, Little Springs Creek – 2.2 miles, and Mill Creek-2.0 miles. None of these blockages were road crossings. Through this diversion removal Mill Creek was reconnected with Little Springs Creek and ultimately the Lemhi River. (5) Natural function was restored to Berg-Green Springs and DC Gulch Springs, neither of which are fish bearing at this time. (6) Re-contoured L-52 at points where ephemeral draws bisect the canal to allow natural water flow during run-off events approximately 7 miles. (7) Transferred water rights and completed an agreement between the livestock company and the Idaho Department of Water Resources to not divert from Lemhi Little Springs Creek: Upper Lemhi River-4.06 cfs for approximately 7 miles, Little Springs Creek - 2.0 cfs for approximately 3.5 miles, and Mill Creek – 1.0 cfs for approximately .5 miles. This resulted in 11 miles of stream protected for adequate flow. (8) Though not originally proposed channel reconfiguration and connectivity was addressed. A total of approximately 0.3 miles of stream was treated for channel reconfiguration and connectivity through enhancement of 0.23 miles of the Lemhi River flood plain and creation of 0.02 miles of off channel habitat created. (9) Although not originally proposed, a concrete vault was constructed and a pump installed at a spring head to pump and supply water to five water troughs that were purchased and installed to provide water to livestock. Approximately 120 feet (0.02 miles) of jack pole fence was constructed around the spring head to exclude livestock, promote vegetation and protect the pump and pump and equipment. (10) Approximately 0.1 acres of slope was stabilized for sediment control. (11) Approximately 0.1 miles wetland acres were treated through the removal of a ditch to create a floodplain and planting vegetation.

The primary focus of this project was to improve flow to functionally reconnect Lemhi Little Springs Creek to the Lemhi River. The project actions have and will continue to improve spawning and rearing habitat for ESA listed species.

Project Benefit    


The removal of barriers and improved flow and stream habitat will benefit abundance, productivity, spatial structure, and genetic integrity of ESA listed Chinook salmon and steelhead in the Lemhi River sub-basin. These species will have greater access to good quality spawning and rearing habitat in Little Springs and Mill creeks. Specific benefits to the habitat include: (1) increased flows from 2-13 cfs for more than 6 miles of upper Lemhi River and/or Little Springs, (2) increased connectivity of lower Mill Creek with Little Springs, (3) improved connectivity of Little Springs with the Lemhi River (4) elimination of fish passage barriers in Little Springs, Mill Creek and a channel of the upper Lemhi River, (5) elimination of fish entrainment at L-52 and Little Springs as well as L-52 and Mill Creek, and (6) reduction of sediment and water temperatures in Little Springs

Accomplishments

Metric Completed Originally
Proposed
Instream Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated .30 .01
Wetland Habitat
  Acres Created
  Acres Treated .1 .0
Riparian Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated .30 .01
  Acres Treated .5 .0
Upland Habitat
  Acres Treated .1 .1
Fish Passage
  Barriers Removed 3 4
  Miles Opened 4.50 2.26

Funding Details

SourceFunds
PCSRF$21,339
Other$444,797
In-Kind Donated Labor$576
In-Kind Other$57,690
Report Total:$524,402


Project Map



Worksites

L-52    


  • Worksite Identifier: L-52
  • Start Date: 07/07/2010
  • End Date: 12/31/2012
Area Description

No Area Description data was found for this worksite.

Location Information

  • Basin: Salmon (170602)
  • Subbasin:
  • Watershed:
  • Subwatershed:
  • State: Idaho
  • Recovery Domain: Snake River
  • Latitude: 44.756889
  • Longitude: -113.488944

ESU

  • Snake River Basin Steelhead DPS
  • Snake River Spring/Summer-run Chinook Salmon ESU
  • Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon ESU

Map

Photos

Metrics

Metrics
  • C.0 Salmonid Habitat Restoration and AcquisitionY (Y/N)
    •      . . C.0.a Habitat restoration and acquisition funding 524,402.00
    •      . . C.0.b Length of stream treated/protected 11.00
    •      . . C.0.c
      Project identified in a Plan or Watershed Assessment
      Northwest Power and Conservation Council. 2005. “Salmon Subbasin Management Plan.” In Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Portland, Oregon.
    •      . . C.0.d.1 Project Monitoring (LOV)
    •      . . C.0.d.2 Monitoring Location (LOV)
    •      . . C.0.d.3
      Monitoring text (from Phase I)
      The IDFG will complete compliance and effectiveness monitoring activities under the Lemhi Conservation Program. Implementation will occur under the Integrated Status and Effectiveness Monitoring Project. An effectiveness monitoring design will be developed to establish how these projects increase the quantity and improve the quality of existing habitat. Habitat response measures include adequate passage flows, the amount of wetted area provided by the target flow, the response of the riparian community, and changes in stream temperature. Fish response will be measured in this reach at several intervals throughout the watershed. These include expanded distribution of anadromous fish, changes in survival, changes in size and age distribution of stream resident/fluvial trout, and changes in abundance. Monitoring strategies will include use of PIT tags and arrays to interrogate tags, electrofishing, snorkeling, and trapping.
    •      . . C.2 Fish Passage ImprovementY (Y/N)
      •      . . . . C.2.a Fish Passage Funding 120,715.00
      •      . . . . C.2.b.1 Length of stream made accessible 4.50
      •      . . . . C.2.b.3 Type of blockage/barrier (LOV)
      •      . . . . C.2.b.4 Number of blockages/impediments/barriers impeding passage 3
      •      . . . . C.2.c.1 Fish passage blockages removed or altered (other than road crossings reported in C.2.f to C.2.i)Y (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . C.2.c.2 Number of blockages/impediments/barriers removed/altered 3
      •      . . C.3 Instream Flow ProjectY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . C.3.a Instream Flow Funding 326,752.00
        •      . . . . C.3.b Length of stream 'protected' for adequate flow 11.00
        •      . . . . C.3.c Change in water flow7.06 (cfs)
        •      . . . . C.3.d.1 Water flow gaugesY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.3.d.2 Number of water flow gauges 1
        •      . . . . C.3.e.1 Irrigation practice improvementY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.3.e.2 Acre feet of water conserved per year2521 (Acre feet)
          •      . . . . . . C.3.e.4 Initial start date of action or agreement06/01/2012 (mm/dd/yyyy)
          •      . . . . . . C.3.e.5 Final end date of action or agreement12/31/9999 (mm/dd/yyyy)
        •      . . . . C.3.f.1 Water leased or purchasedY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.3.f.2 Acre feet of water per year purchased/leased427 (Acre feet)
          •      . . . . . . C.3.f.3 cfs (cubic feet per second) of water purchased/leased4 (cfs)
          •      . . . . . . C.3.f.4 Start date of no withdrawal04/15/2011 (mm/dd/yyyy)
          •      . . . . . . C.3.f.5 End date of no withdrawal.11/15/2031 (mm/dd/yyyy)
        •      . . C.4 Instream Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . C.4.a Instream Habitat Funding 25,671.00
          •      . . . . C.4.b Total length of instream habitat treated .30
          •      . . . . C.4.c.1 Channel reconfiguration and connectivityY (Y/N)
            •      . . . . . . C.4.c.2 Type of change to channel configuration and connectivity (LOV)
            •      . . . . . . C.4.c.3 Miles of stream treated for channel reconfiguration and connectivity .30
            •      . . . . . . C.4.c.4 Miles of off-channel stream created through channel reconfiguration and connectivity .02
            •      . . . . . . C.4.c.6 Instream pools created/added through channel reconfiguration and connectivity 0
          •      . . . . C.4.e.1 Streambank stabilization Y (Y/N)
            •      . . . . . . C.4.e.2 Material Used For Streambank Stabilization (LOV)
            •      . . . . . . C.4.e.3 Miles of streambank stabilized .30
          •      . . C.5 Riparian Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
            •      . . . . C.5.a Riparian Habitat Funding 7,568.00
            •      . . . . C.5.b.1 Total riparian miles streambank treated .30
            •      . . . . C.5.b.2 Total Riparian Acres Treated .5
            •      . . . . C.5.c.1 Riparian plantingY (Y/N)
              •      . . . . . . C.5.c.2
                Species of plants planted in riparian
                Salix boothii, Salix geyeriana, Carex nebrascensis, and Juncus balticus
              •      . . . . . . C.5.c.3 Acres planted in riparian .5
            •      . . C.6 Upland Habitat And Sediment ProjectY (Y/N)
              •      . . . . C.6.a Upland Habitat / Sediment Funding 36,128.00
              •      . . . . C.6.b.1 Acres of upland habitat area treated .1
              •      . . . . C.6.g.1 Slope stabilizationY (Y/N)
                •      . . . . . . C.6.g.2 Acres treated for slope stabilization .1
              •      . . . . C.6.j.1 Upland livestock management Y (Y/N)
                •      . . . . . . C.6.j.2 Upland livestock management action(s) taken (LOV)
                •      . . . . . . C.6.j.4 Number of livestock water installations/developments 5
              •      . . C.8 Wetland ProjectY (Y/N)
                •      . . . . C.8.a Wetland funding 7,568.00
                •      . . . . C.8.b Total acres of wetland area treated .1
                •      . . . . C.8.e.1 Wetland improvement/restorationY (Y/N)
                  •      . . . . . . C.8.e.2 Acres of wetland treated .1