Sweetwater Bridge and Stream Design
Salmonid Restoration Planning and Assessments
|
| 007 23 CW | | Snake River | | 11/29/0023 | | 09/30/2025 | | 2023 | | Completed | | 04/02/2026 | | |
| |
Description
The Nez Perce Tribe completed 100% designs for channel realignment and bridge replacement on a 0.20 mile segment of Sweetwater Creek near the confluence of Sweetwater Creek and Lapwai Creek in Idaho. The designs addressed current habitat conditions including a straightened stream segment with little to no large woody debris, is confined by Webb Road and an agricultural field, no side channels or lateral habitat, and limited floodplain access due to infrastructure and agriculture. The stream is confined by a concrete wall forcing it into an undersized and aging bridge. The current bridge has a 100-year backwater level of two feet and an overtopping flood at the 2-year interval. This leads to frequent juvenile salmonid stranding in the adjacent agricultural fields.
The completed designs for the Sweetwater Bridge and Stream Project include a new properly sized AOP bridge which meets county bridge requirements, will pass the 100-year flood event, that will allow passage for all life-stages of salmonids, other fish and aquatic organisms, large wood, and substrate, a realigned main channel with increased floodplain access, one side channel, and three more high flow channels. Designs also include 16 in-stream large wood structures, 8 floodplain large wood structures, and 1440 native trees and shrubs. Implementation for the restoration phase of this project has been funded by PCSRF project 006 25 CW and will occur in 2027.
This project was completed under budget due to bids coming in less than expected.
Project Benefit
Designs for a properly sized bridge and more complex stream segment (including large wood, pools, and stream length) would greatly reduce juvenile salmonid stranding, directly increase Essential Fish Habitat for ESA listed Steelhead and reintroduced Spring Chinook and Coho Salmon, expand floodplain access, and increase native riparian vegetation including large woody species.
Funding Details |
| Other | $134,973 |
| Report Total: | $134,973 |
|
| |
Worksites
WS 1
- Worksite Identifier: WS 1
- Start Date: 05/01/2024
- End Date: 04/30/2026
Area Description
No Area Description data was found for this worksite.
Location Information
- Basin: Clearwater (170603)
- Subbasin: Clearwater (17060306)
- Watershed: Lapwai Creek (1706030612)
- Subwatershed:
- State: Idaho
- Recovery Domain: Snake River
- Latitude: 46.3462532
- Longitude: -116.8283148
ESU
- Snake River Basin Steelhead DPS
Map
Photos
Metrics
Metrics
- B.0
Salmonid Restoration Planning and AssessmentsY (Y/N)
- . . B.0.a
Planning And Assessment Funding 371,320.00
- . . B.0.b.1
Area Encompassed 9.0
- . . B.0.b.2
Stream Miles Affected .20
- . . B.1
Restoration Planning And CoordinationY (Y/N)
- . . . . B.1.a
Planning and Coordination funding 371,320.00
- . . . . B.1.b.11
Engineering/design work for restoration projectsY (Y/N)
- . . . . . . B.1.b.11.a
| Name of plan implemented | |
| NMFS 2017. ESA Recovery Plan for Snake River Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) & Snake River Basin Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss). |
- . . . . . . B.1.b.11.b
| Description and scope of the plan implemented | |
| The Plan’s overall recovery strategy aims to establish self-sustaining, naturally spawning populations of Snake River spring/summer Chinook salmon and steelhead that are sufficiently abundant, productive, and diverse, and no longer need ESA protection. Achieving species recovery will require coordinated and collaborative management and implementation of actions at local, watershed, and regional levels. Improved tributary spawning, rearing, and migration conditions means that more fish will reproduce, more juveniles will survive and migrate, and consequently more adults will return to the area. Limiting factors listed in the Recovery Plan that are addressed in the project design include; temperature, instream flow, riparian vegetation, floodplain connectivity, and habitat complexity (NOAA 2017, Chapter 6, pp 47-56). |
|
|