Couse Creek at Blue Mountain Station Fish Passage

Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Acquisition

Fish Passage Improvement Instream Habitat Riparian Habitat
Project IDOWEB 221-6021-19606
Recovery DomainsMiddle Columbia River
Start Date10/26/2021
End Date07/24/2023
Year2019
StatusCompleted
Last Edited05/03/2024
 
1 - 1

Description    


Removal of a concrete irrigation dam functioning as a fish passage barrier was successfully accomplished to open suitable salmonid habitat upstream. Channel structure features were added to improve stream habitat diversity by placing whole trees with root wads, boulders, and logs. Streambank stabilization was incorrectly reported at project proposal, as the activities done are best descriped under channel structure placement. Invasive species removal and multiple tree planting efforts with native willow and cottonwood species were conducted, and supplemental tree plantings were conducted to achieve optimal survival. This vegetation will provide much needed shading to an exposed creek system which has intermittent, seasonal base flows and water temperatures approaching levels of intolerance regarding salmonid inhabitance.

Project Benefit    


The WWBWC is following hierarchical strategies for prioritizing restoration actions in Pacific Northwest Watersheds as outlined by prominent Pacific Northwest authors Phil Roni and Tim Beechie in various guidance papers. More specifically, we are focusing on reconnecting isolated high-quality fish habitat made inaccessible by obstructions, which is recommended before methods that produce less consistent results. Various published scientific literature shows that reconnecting habitats provides a potent return on investment in the form of quick biological response, high likelihood to succeed, and last many decades. Following passage rectification, WWBWC is progressing into Phase 3--implementing Beaver Dam Analogs and PALS structures over multiple years in the middle to upstream reaches. WWBWC Aquatic Habitat Inventory results determined that 53% of the creek was classified as perennial and 47% was intermittent, typical of a classic steelhead centric system. The majority of suitable, wetted habitat units are located upstream from the impediment at RM 3 as the entire section downstream goes subsurface annually. Within the perennial reaches approaching the headwaters exists habitat values that rank as moderate to high and provide year round suitability to life stages of salmonid inhabitance. Couse Creek provides approximately 20% of the documented redd counts on an annual basis. Adults spawn in the lower reaches that eventually go dry, but evolutionary adaptation triggers offspring to seek perennial reaches in the headwaters and adjacent mainstem Walla Walla river. Upon rectifying the final passage impediment at RM 3, fishes should have free will movement to advantageous habitats and ultimately contribute to biological response to positive changes in physical habitat features as result of restoration actions.

Accomplishments

Metric Completed Originally
Proposed
Instream Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated .10 .10
Riparian Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated .10 .10
  Acres Treated 2.0 2.0
Fish Passage
  Barriers Removed 1 1
  Miles Opened 11.00 11.00

Funding Details

SourceFunds
PCSRF$62,774
Other$145,554
Report Total:$208,328


Project Map



Worksites

20230011    


  • Worksite Identifier: 20230011
  • Start Date:
  • End Date:
Area Description

No Area Description data was found for this worksite.

Location Information

  • Basin:
  • Subbasin:
  • Watershed:
  • Subwatershed:
  • State: Oregon
  • Recovery Domain: Middle Columbia River
  • Latitude: 45.8687747
  • Longitude: -118.36751381

ESU

  • Middle Columbia River Steelhead DPS

Map

Photos

Metrics

Metrics
  • C.0 Salmonid Habitat Restoration and AcquisitionY (Y/N)
    •      . . C.0.a Habitat restoration and acquisition funding 208,328.00
    •      . . C.0.b Length of stream treated/protected .10
    •      . . C.0.c
      Project identified in a Plan or Watershed Assessment
      National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Region, 2009-11-01, Middle Columbia River Steelhead Distinct Population Segment ESA Recovery Plan; Northwest Power and Conservation Council, 2004-05-01, Northwest Power and Conservation Council Walla Walla Subbasin Plan; Office of the Governor, State of Oregon, 1999-01-01, The Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds; Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2003-09-12, Oregon's Native Fish Conservation Policy; Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2010-02-01, Conservation and Recovery Plan for Oregon Steelhead Populations in the Middle Columbia River Steelhead Distinct Population Segment; Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2016-01-01, Oregon Conservation Strategy ;
    •      . . C.0.d.1 Project Monitoring (LOV)
    •      . . C.0.d.2 Monitoring Location (LOV)
    •      . . C.2 Fish Passage ImprovementY (Y/N)
      •      . . . . C.2.a Fish Passage Funding 122,894.79
      •      . . . . C.2.b.1 Length of stream made accessible 11.00
      •      . . . . C.2.b.3 Type of blockage/barrier (LOV)
      •      . . . . C.2.b.4 Number of blockages/impediments/barriers impeding passage 1
      •      . . . . C.2.c.1 Fish passage blockages removed or altered (other than road crossings reported in C.2.f to C.2.i)Y (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . C.2.c.2 Number of blockages/impediments/barriers removed/altered 1
      •      . . C.4 Instream Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . C.4.a Instream Habitat Funding 57,845.40
        •      . . . . C.4.b Total length of instream habitat treated .10
        •      . . . . C.4.d.1 Channel structure placementY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.4.d.2 Material used for channel structure (LOV)
          •      . . . . . . C.4.d.3 Miles of stream treated through channel structure placement .10
          •      . . . . . . C.4.d.5 Pools expected to be created through channel structure placement 3
          •      . . . . . . C.4.d.7 Number of structures placed in channel 3
        •      . . . . C.4.e.1 Streambank stabilization Y (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.4.e.2 Material Used For Streambank Stabilization (LOV)
          •      . . . . . . C.4.e.3 Miles of streambank stabilized .00
        •      . . C.5 Riparian Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . C.5.a Riparian Habitat Funding 27,587.81
          •      . . . . C.5.b.1 Total riparian miles streambank treated .10
          •      . . . . C.5.b.2 Total Riparian Acres Treated 2.0
          •      . . . . C.5.c.1 Riparian plantingY (Y/N)
            •      . . . . . . C.5.c.2
              Species of plants planted in riparian
              Cottonwood; Native Willow
            •      . . . . . . C.5.c.3 Acres planted in riparian 2.0
            •      . . . . . . C.5.c.4 Miles of streambank treated with riparian planting .05
          •      . . . . C.5.h.1 Riparian plant removal/controlY (Y/N)
            •      . . . . . . C.5.h.2
              Species of plants treated/removed in riparian
              Blackberry, yellow star thistle, bull thistle
            •      . . . . . . C.5.h.3 Acres of riparian treated for plant removal/control .3
            •      . . . . . . C.5.h.4 Miles of streambank treated for riparian plant removal/control .03