North Newell Creek Stream Restoration Project

Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Acquisition

Instream Habitat
Project IDOWEB 220-8207-18722
Recovery Domains -
Start Date06/01/2020
End Date03/24/2023
Year2019
StatusCompleted
Last Edited04/12/2024
 
1 - 1

Description    


The North Newell Creek Stream Restoration project successfully placed over 150 logs in jams along 5,800 linear feet of Newell creek above the confluence with Abernethy Creek. Log structures were placed as designed to improve channel complexity, provide channel spanning logs, many with rootwads and brush to improve habitat structure, retain and sort gravels for spawning, and form pools for rearing. Additionally, three log structures along the main channel of Abernethy Creek near the confluence with Newell creek were constructed to provide refugia for rearing salmon, trout, and other native fish.

Project Benefit    


Lower Columbia River coho and winter steelhead are negatively impacted by loss of habitat, impaired water quality and lack of access to historic spawning areas. This project will restore habitat elements believed to be most limiting to salmon and steelhead as identified in local and regional assessments referenced above and below in this application. Lack of Large Wood (Riparian corridor, instream): Only one tree greater than 20’’ DBH every 1,000 feet was noted within the channel’s active riparian area. Several more upland pieces were identified. Due to this limited number of large trees in the riparian areas, few opportunities exist for large trees to fall and provide the amount of large wood to stream channels necessary for high quality fish habitat. Further, a 2017 stream habitat inventory (Cascade Environmental Group) found there are relatively low quantities of instream large wood pieces, particularly large logs (key large wood pieces). Replacing large wood along Newell Creek and Abernethy Creek in addition to lacking large wood along the river corridor will provide salmon and steelhead complex overhanging cover and recruit gravels for improved substrate complexity. Upland downed wood is also important for amphibians and other terrestrial species that require escape cover and areas for hibernation. Significantly increasing the density of large wood on the site would greatly enhance biological conditions for fish and wildlife.

Accomplishments

Metric Completed Originally
Proposed
Instream Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated 1.10 1.10

Funding Details

SourceFunds
PCSRF$176,079
Other$111,126
In-Kind Donated Labor$3,840
Report Total:$291,045


Project Map



Worksites

20220269    


  • Worksite Identifier: 20220269
  • Start Date:
  • End Date:
Area Description

No Area Description data was found for this worksite.

Location Information

  • Basin:
  • Subbasin:
  • Watershed:
  • Subwatershed:
  • State:
  • Recovery Domain:
  • Latitude: 45.3559194
  • Longitude: -122.5799594

ESU

  • Lower Columbia River Coho Salmon ESU
  • Lower Columbia River Steelhead DPS

Map

Photos

Metrics

Metrics
  • C.0 Salmonid Habitat Restoration and AcquisitionY (Y/N)
    •      . . C.0.a Habitat restoration and acquisition funding 291,045.00
    •      . . C.0.b Length of stream treated/protected 1.10
    •      . . C.0.c
      Project identified in a Plan or Watershed Assessment
      National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Region, 2013-06-01, ESA Recovery Plan for Lower Columbia River Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River Chinook Salmon, Columbia River Chum Salmon, and Lower Columbia River Steelhead; Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2016-01-01, Oregon Conservation Strategy ;
    •      . . C.0.d.1 Project Monitoring (LOV)
    •      . . C.0.d.2 Monitoring Location (LOV)
    •      . . C.4 Instream Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
      •      . . . . C.4.a Instream Habitat Funding 291,045.00
      •      . . . . C.4.b Total length of instream habitat treated 1.10
      •      . . . . C.4.d.1 Channel structure placementY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.2 Material used for channel structure (LOV)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.3 Miles of stream treated through channel structure placement 1.10
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.5 Pools expected to be created through channel structure placement 3
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.7 Number of structures placed in channel 34