Lower Fry Creek Meadow

Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Acquisition

Instream Habitat Riparian Habitat
Project ID008 20 CW
Recovery DomainsSnake River
Start Date12/09/2020
End Date09/14/2023
Year2020
StatusCompleted
Last Edited02/27/2024
 
1 - 1

Description    


The Lower Fry Creek Meadow project treated 0.85 mile of habitat restoration on the East Fork Potlatch River, Idaho, on private land. Wild steelhead within the Lower Clearwater population spawn and rear in this reach of river and will directly benefit from the improved habitat conditions for juvenile steelhead.



Project elements completed to address instream flow and habitat as well as riparian habitat, while restoring natural river processes and function included: 1) installation of channel spanning wood jams and large trees for immediate habitat complexity to provide sheltered pools, complexity, sediment sorting, and improved floodplain inundation, 2) constructed riffles to raise water surface elevation and reconnect two relic channels to inundate the floodplain to provide off-channel lateral habitat, 3) installation of logs for streambank stabilization, 4) adding spawning gravel, and 5) cattle-exclusion fencing, water gaps, and replanting of disturbed areas with native vegetation to stabilize banks and reduce fine sediment inputs, prevent the spread of noxious weeds, and provide long term wood recruitment and shade.

Project Benefit    


The NOAA recovery plan for Snake River Basin steelhead (NMFS 2017) identified impaired fish passage, reduced stream complexity and channel structure, excess fine sediment, elevated summer water temperatures, diminished streamflow during critical periods, reduced floodplain connectivity and function, and degraded riparian conditions as the primary steelhead liming factors in this watershed. The Lower Fry Creek Meadow project will directly address these limiting factors using locally sourced trees to increase habitat complexity, create pools, provide cover, staging areas for adults, recruitment and retention of spawning gravels, add lateral habitat, and create overwintering and summer rearing habitat for ESA-listed steelhead on 1.2 mile of the East Fork Potlatch River, a Tier 1 sub watershed in the Potlatch River basin. Trees will be positioned within the channel as debris, log jams, and channel spanners in locations designed to maximize their benefit for increasing juvenile rearing and overwintering habitat, backwatering floodplains and increasing lateral habitat, improving spawning conditions through sediment aggradation and sorting, and stabilizing banks in some areas. Previous habitat restoration work in this area focused on restoring a historic meander while moving the previous altered alignment away from the road and did not extend to the downstream property boundary. The proposed project will increase habitat connectivity and provide a cumulative benefit to steelhead along with two other recently implemented large wood habitat projects downstream; in combination with the recently completed Dammerman project (PCSRF 007 17 CW) and the instream portion of the Stowers project (PCSRF 015 18 CW), approximately three miles of contiguous large wood habitat will be provided for ESA-listed steelhead. As spawning and rearing conditions improve, the number of juvenile steelhead surviving in the East Fork Potlatch River to pre-smolt and smolt stages is expected to exhibit a detectable response and a potential increase in juvenile emigrant production between 10 – 43% (Uthe et al. 2017). The East Fork Potlatch River is monitored and evaluated annually by the Potlatch River Steelhead Monitoring and Evaluation (PRSME) project and this project will be intensively monitored to document how steelhead respond to restoration actions and inform adaptive management decision-making.

Accomplishments

Metric Completed Originally
Proposed
Instream Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated .85 .85
Riparian Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated 1.63 1.63
  Acres Treated 46.6 46.6

Funding Details

SourceFunds
PCSRF$193,122
Other$77,388
Report Total:$270,510


Project Map



Worksites

WS-1    


  • Worksite Identifier: WS-1
  • Start Date: 08/01/2021
  • End Date: 10/31/2023
Area Description

No Area Description data was found for this worksite.

Location Information

  • Basin: Clearwater (170603)
  • Subbasin: Clearwater (17060306)
  • Watershed: Upper Potlatch River (1706030608)
  • Subwatershed: East Fork Potlatch River (170603060801)
  • State: Idaho
  • Recovery Domain: Snake River
  • Latitude: 46.850158
  • Longitude: -116.361199

ESU

  • Snake River Basin Steelhead DPS

Map

Photos

Metrics

Metrics
  • C.0 Salmonid Habitat Restoration and AcquisitionY (Y/N)
    •      . . C.0.a Habitat restoration and acquisition funding 270,510.00
    •      . . C.0.b Length of stream treated/protected .85
    •      . . C.0.c
      Project identified in a Plan or Watershed Assessment
    •      . . C.0.d.1 Project Monitoring (LOV)
    •      . . C.0.d.2 Monitoring Location (LOV)
    •      . . C.4 Instream Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
      •      . . . . C.4.a Instream Habitat Funding 259,212.00
      •      . . . . C.4.b Total length of instream habitat treated .85
      •      . . . . C.4.c.1 Channel reconfiguration and connectivityY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.2 Type of change to channel configuration and connectivity (LOV)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.3 Miles of stream treated for channel reconfiguration and connectivity .85
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.4 Miles of off-channel stream created through channel reconfiguration and connectivity .20
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.5 Acres of off-channel or floodplain connected through channel reconfiguration and connectivity 1.1
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.6 Instream pools created/added through channel reconfiguration and connectivity 0
      •      . . . . C.4.d.1 Channel structure placementY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.2 Material used for channel structure (LOV)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.3 Miles of stream treated through channel structure placement .85
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.4 Acres of streambed treated through channel structure placement 4.3
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.5 Pools expected to be created through channel structure placement 17
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.6 Yards of average stream-width at mid-point of channel structure placement project (Yards)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.7 Number of structures placed in channel 102
      •      . . . . C.4.e.1 Streambank stabilization Y (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.e.2 Material Used For Streambank Stabilization (LOV)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.e.3 Miles of streambank stabilized .10
      •      . . . . C.4.f.1 Spawning gravel placementY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.f.2 Miles of stream treated with addition of spawning gravel .07
        •      . . . . . . C.4.f.3 Cubic yards of spawning gravel placed570 (Cubic yards)
      •      . . C.5 Riparian Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . C.5.a Riparian Habitat Funding 11,298.00
        •      . . . . C.5.b.1 Total riparian miles streambank treated 1.63
        •      . . . . C.5.b.2 Total Riparian Acres Treated 46.6
        •      . . . . C.5.c.1 Riparian plantingY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.5.c.2
            Species of plants planted in riparian
            Picea engelmannii,Thuja plicata, Pseudotsuga menziesii, Pinus ponderosa, P. contorta, Bromus carinatus, B. marginatus, Elymus glaucus, Pseudoroegneria spicata, Gaillardia aristata, Achillea millefolium, Agropstis exarata, Beckmannia Syzigachne, Calamagrostis Canadensis, Danthonia Californica, Deschampsia Cespitosa, D. Elongata, Glyceria Striata, Hordeum Brachyantherum
          •      . . . . . . C.5.c.3 Acres planted in riparian 46.6
          •      . . . . . . C.5.c.4 Miles of streambank treated with riparian planting 1.63
        •      . . . . C.5.d.1 FencingY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.5.d.2 Miles of fence along stream 1.49
          •      . . . . . . C.5.d.3 Acres of riparian area protected by fencing 77.5
        •      . . . . C.5.f.1 Water gap developmentY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.5.f.2 Number of water gap installations 2
          •      . . . . . . C.5.f.3 Miles of streambank protected by water gap development .85