Klamath River Post-Dam Removal Restoration
Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Acquisition
|
OWEB 223-8013-23787 | - | 10/26/2022 | 12/31/2025 | 2021 | Ongoing | 04/30/2025 | |
| |
Description
The Klamath River, located in Northern California and Southern Oregon, is currently being transformed by the worlds largest dam removal project, as four outdated hydropower dams are demolished to restore the rivers imperiled ecosystem and salmon runs. The Lower Klamath Project consists of four hydroelectric developments on the Klamath River – J.C. Boyle, Copco No. 1, Copco No. 2, and Iron Gate – and associated facilities. The Klamath River Renewal Corporation (KRRC) is overseeing removal of the facilities and restoration of the previously inundated lands. In November 2022, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued the License Surrender Order (LSO) approving facility removal and habitat restoration, including measures described in the Reservoir Area Management Plan (RAMP). The RAMP was developed in consultation with federal, state and county governments and tribes and describes the specific management measures that KRRC will implement in connection with the restoration, monitoring, and adaptive management of the Reservoir Areas and High Priority Tributaries, as well as the fish passage monitoring KRRC will conduct within the RAMP Fish Passage Monitoring Area. Project activities include fish passage blockage removal; instream channel reconfiguration and structure placement; riparian planting; upland erosion control structure placement, planting, and vegetation management; and wetland planting, plant removal, and improvement/restoration. OWEB grant funds will be used to support the RAMP work in Oregon, resulting in stabilized and seeded lands around J.C. Boyle reservoir, including at the power canal and scour hole, tributary reconnection at Spencer Creek, and supporting the overall aquatic health of the river system.
Project Benefit
As a result of the actions described in the Reservoir Area Management Plan, it is anticipated that volitional fish passage will be restored within the project lands, exposed sediment will be stabilized, native plants will be established, and native aquatic habitat will be enhanced. In addition, it is anticipated that natural river functions and processes will be restored within the project area. Natural river functions and processes include: Maintenance of Natural Hydrology: River flow is unimpeded through the Reservoir Areas and responds to natural hydrologic conditions; Maintenance of Sediment Transport Processes: Sediment aggradation and degradation is occurring, and sediment is being transported through the Hydroelectric Reach and into the mainstem river below the former Iron Gate Dam; Recruitment and Propagation of Vegetation: The natural recruitment and propagation of native plant species is occurring; and Existence of Fish and Aquatic Invertebrate Habitat: Habitat for fish and aquatic invertebrates is available in the project area and in key tributaries.
Accomplishments
Instream Habitat |
Stream Miles Treated |
|
.10 |
Wetland Habitat |
Acres Created |
|
|
Acres Treated |
|
10.0 |
Riparian Habitat |
Stream Miles Treated |
|
7.00 |
Acres Treated |
|
40.0 |
Upland Habitat |
Acres Treated |
|
250.0 |
Fish Passage |
Barriers Removed |
|
2 |
Miles Opened |
|
250.00 |
Funding Details |
PCSRF | $7,967,000 |
State | $3,533,000 |
Other | $1 |
In-Kind Donated Labor | $2,499 |
Report Total: | $11,502,500 |
|
| |
Worksites
23787
- Worksite Identifier: 23787
- Start Date:
- End Date:
Area Description
No Area Description data was found for this worksite.
Location Information
- Basin:
- Subbasin:
- Watershed:
- Subwatershed:
- State:
- Recovery Domain:
- Latitude: 42.1235
- Longitude: -122.0483
ESU
- Southern Oregon/Northern California Coast Coho Salmon ESU
Map
Photos
Metrics
Metrics
- C.0
Salmonid Habitat Restoration and AcquisitionY (Y/N)
- . . C.0.a
Habitat restoration and acquisition funding
- . . C.0.b
Length of stream treated/protected
- . . C.0.c
Project identified in a Plan or Watershed Assessment | |
|
- . . C.0.d.1
Project Monitoring (LOV)
- . . C.0.d.2
Monitoring Location (LOV)
- . . C.2
Fish Passage ImprovementY (Y/N)
- . . . . C.2.a
Fish Passage Funding
- . . . . C.2.b.1
Length of stream made accessible
- . . . . C.2.b.3
Type of blockage/barrier (LOV)
- . . . . C.2.b.4
Number of blockages/impediments/barriers impeding passage
- . . . . C.2.c.1
Fish passage blockages removed or altered (other than road crossings reported in C.2.f to C.2.i)Y (Y/N)
- . . . . . . C.2.c.2
Number of blockages/impediments/barriers removed/altered
- . . C.4
Instream Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
- . . . . C.4.a
Instream Habitat Funding
- . . . . C.4.b
Total length of instream habitat treated
- . . . . C.4.c.1
Channel reconfiguration and connectivityY (Y/N)
- . . . . C.4.d.1
Channel structure placementY (Y/N)
- . . C.5
Riparian Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
- . . . . C.5.a
Riparian Habitat Funding
- . . . . C.5.b.1
Total riparian miles streambank treated
- . . . . C.5.b.2
Total Riparian Acres Treated
- . . . . C.5.c.1
Riparian plantingY (Y/N)
- . . C.6
Upland Habitat And Sediment ProjectY (Y/N)
- . . . . C.6.a
Upland Habitat / Sediment Funding
- . . . . C.6.b.1
Acres of upland habitat area treated
- . . . . C.6.e.1
Erosion control structures installedY (Y/N)
- . . . . C.6.f.1
Planting for erosion and sediment controlY (Y/N)
- . . . . . . C.6.f.2
Species of plants planted for erosion and sediment control | |
|
- . . . . C.6.h.1
Upland vegetation managementY (Y/N)
- . . . . . . C.6.h.2
Species of plants in upland vegetation management | |
|
- . . C.8
Wetland ProjectY (Y/N)
- . . . . C.8.a
Wetland funding
- . . . . C.8.b
Total acres of wetland area treated
- . . . . C.8.c.1
Wetland plantingY (Y/N)
- . . . . C.8.d.1
Wetland plant removal/controlY (Y/N)
- . . . . C.8.e.1
Wetland improvement/restorationY (Y/N)
|
|