Beaver Creek Watershed Restoration

Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Acquisition

Fish Passage Improvement Instream Habitat Riparian Habitat Upland Habitat And Sediment
Project IDOWEB 220-4001-16974
Recovery Domains -
Start Date10/15/2019
End Date12/23/2024
Year2019
StatusCompleted
Last Edited04/30/2025
 
1 - 1

Description    


This watershed-scale project lies within the Trout Creek Watershed. Project activities in instream and riparian areas included culvert replacement, channel reconfiguration, LWD placement, riparian planting, riparian exclusion fencing, and invasive plant removal. Upland activities included planting for erosion control, invasive plant removal, livestock exclusion fencing, and livestock water development.
Because this projects scheduled end date is after the PCSRF FFY 2019 award closes, no funds allocated for this project are reported as match to PCSRF funds.

Project Benefit    


Removing encroaching conifer stands from sagebrush and grassland ecosystems can increase late season water retention in western rangelands by holding snow longer in the spring. Researchers with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Research Service analyzed snow and streamflow data from a snow-dominated sagebrush steppe ecosystem in southwest Idaho to evaluate the impact that juniper-dominated landscapes might have on water availability in the system. They found that areas with more juniper had earlier snow melt and less streamflow relative to sagebrush-dominated landscapes. The water retention in sagebrush systems comes from the increased water storage within snow drifts and delayed release of the melting snow back into the soils. Water delivery is delayed by an average of nine days in sagebrush systems compared to juniper-dominated systems. The implications of this research suggest that conifer removal efforts provide the ecosystem service of improved water availability in these semi-arid systems (Sage Grouse Initiative 2016).

In Central Oregon’s High Desert, a study was performed analyzing the effects of juniper control in 2 similar, adjacent watersheds, commonly referred to as the Paired Watershed Study. In 1994, the Camp Creek Watershed study area was established to monitor the effects of juniper removal on hydrologic processes. In 2005, following 12 years of pre-treatment monitoring in the 2 watersheds (Mays and Jensen) all post-European aged juniper (juniper < 140 years of age) were cut from the treatment watershed (Mays). Analysis indicated that juniper reduction significantly increased late season spring flow by 225 percent (alpha > .05), increased days of recorded ground water by an average of 41 days (alpha > .05) and increased the relative availability of late season soil moisture at soil depths of .76 m (27 inches) (alpha > 0.1). Ephemeral channel flow did not show a predictable trend following 2 years of post-treatment measurements. The Camp Creek project illustrated that for this system, managing vegetation for water yield may be obtainable at a much lower precipitation threshold than what was previously understood. (Deboodt et. al. 2008)

The Conant Basin Project, located near Post, Oregon in the Crooked River watershed, was funded by NRCS. This project is very similar to the proposed project, treating an entire watershed with multiple landowners, implementing upland and riparian practices to enhance the landscape and improve the hydrologic function of the watershed while enhancing fish and wildlife habitat. Starting in 2008, Conant Basin treated 3282.4 acres of Juniper Removal, 558.2 ac of Prescribed Fire, 203.2 ac of Forest Stand Improvement, 105.6 ac of Range Seeding, 32.9 ac of CREP Buffer (5,800 feet of stream), and 5 Spring Developments. The resulting project has resulted in perennial streamflow the past 3 years, a phenomenon that hasn’t occurred in some of the landowner’s lifetime.

Trout Creek is the major spawning tributary to the Deschutes River for migrating summer steelhead. Many reaches of Trout Creek and its tributaries are intermittent at best during the late summer months. If there is a slight chance that this project will increase the duration of flow or even lengthen the reach containing perennial flow, improving juvenile rearing habitat quality and quantity, it would be a huge benefit to the ESA listed Mid-Columbia summer steelhead. Significantly improving the instream and floodplain habitat on the lower reach of Beaver Creek, as well as providing access to an estimated 2.8 miles upstream of the culvert will also have positive impact on these fish.

Accomplishments

Metric Completed Originally
Proposed
Instream Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated .26 .15
Riparian Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated .52 1.20
  Acres Treated 4.0 7.7
Upland Habitat
  Acres Treated 1,127.4 3,804.0
Fish Passage
  Barriers Removed
  Miles Opened 2.80 2.80

Funding Details

SourceFunds
State$278,832
Other$94,576
In-Kind Donated Labor$350,355
In-Kind Other$24,000
Report Total:$747,763


Project Map



Worksites

20240128    


  • Worksite Identifier: 20240128
  • Start Date:
  • End Date:
Area Description

No Area Description data was found for this worksite.

Location Information

  • Basin:
  • Subbasin:
  • Watershed:
  • Subwatershed:
  • State:
  • Recovery Domain:
  • Latitude: 44.62703924
  • Longitude: -120.73314624

ESU

  • Middle Columbia River Steelhead DPS

Map

Photos

Metrics

Metrics
  • C.0 Salmonid Habitat Restoration and AcquisitionY (Y/N)
    •      . . C.0.a Habitat restoration and acquisition funding 747,763.00
    •      . . C.0.b Length of stream treated/protected .26
    •      . . C.0.c
      Project identified in a Plan or Watershed Assessment
      Northwest Power and Conservation Council, 2004-01-01, Northwest Power and Conservation Council Deschutes Subbasin Plan; Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2010-02-01, Conservation and Recovery Plan for Oregon Steelhead Populations in the Middle Columbia River Steelhead Distinct Population Segment;
    •      . . C.2 Fish Passage ImprovementY (Y/N)
      •      . . . . C.2.a Fish Passage Funding 146,776.00
      •      . . . . C.2.b.1 Length of stream made accessible 2.80
      •      . . . . C.2.b.3 Type of blockage/barrier (LOV)
      •      . . . . C.2.b.4 Number of blockages/impediments/barriers impeding passage 1
      •      . . . . C.2.f.1 Culvert installed or improved at road stream crossingY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . C.2.f.2 Number of culverts installed or improved 1
        •      . . . . . . C.2.f.3 Miles of stream made accessible by culvert installation/upgrade 2.80
      •      . . C.4 Instream Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . C.4.a Instream Habitat Funding 44,550.00
        •      . . . . C.4.b Total length of instream habitat treated .26
        •      . . . . C.4.c.1 Channel reconfiguration and connectivityY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.4.c.3 Miles of stream treated for channel reconfiguration and connectivity .26
          •      . . . . . . C.4.c.4 Miles of off-channel stream created through channel reconfiguration and connectivity .00
          •      . . . . . . C.4.c.6 Instream pools created/added through channel reconfiguration and connectivity 0
        •      . . . . C.4.d.1 Channel structure placementY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.4.d.3 Miles of stream treated through channel structure placement .26
          •      . . . . . . C.4.d.5 Pools expected to be created through channel structure placement 15
          •      . . . . . . C.4.d.7 Number of structures placed in channel 15
        •      . . C.5 Riparian Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . C.5.a Riparian Habitat Funding 36,244.00
          •      . . . . C.5.b.1 Total riparian miles streambank treated .52
          •      . . . . C.5.b.2 Total Riparian Acres Treated 4.0
          •      . . . . C.5.c.1 Riparian plantingY (Y/N)
            •      . . . . . . C.5.c.2
              Species of plants planted in riparian
              Basin Wildrye, Streambank Wheatgrass, Bluebunch Wheatgrass, Idaho Fescue, Prairie Junegrass, Big Bluegrass, Blanket Flower, Lewis Blue Flax, Yarrow, Rocky Mtn Iris.; Mountain Alder, Water Birch, Red-Osier Dogwood, Black Cottonwood, Quaking Aspen, Coyote Willow, Pacific Willow, Service Berry, Mock Orange, Chokecherry, Golden Currant, Blue Elderberry
            •      . . . . . . C.5.c.3 Acres planted in riparian 4.0
            •      . . . . . . C.5.c.4 Miles of streambank treated with riparian planting .52
          •      . . . . C.5.d.1 FencingY (Y/N)
            •      . . . . . . C.5.d.2 Miles of fence along stream .30
            •      . . . . . . C.5.d.3 Acres of riparian area protected by fencing 1.3
          •      . . . . C.5.h.1 Riparian plant removal/controlY (Y/N)
            •      . . . . . . C.5.h.2
              Species of plants treated/removed in riparian
              Annual Rye, Cheatgrass, Medusahead, Filaree
            •      . . . . . . C.5.h.3 Acres of riparian treated for plant removal/control 2.5
            •      . . . . . . C.5.h.4 Miles of streambank treated for riparian plant removal/control .30
          •      . . C.6 Upland Habitat And Sediment ProjectY (Y/N)
            •      . . . . C.6.a Upland Habitat / Sediment Funding 520,193.00
            •      . . . . C.6.b.1 Acres of upland habitat area treated 1,127.4
            •      . . . . C.6.f.1 Planting for erosion and sediment controlY (Y/N)
              •      . . . . . . C.6.f.2
                Species of plants planted for erosion and sediment control
                Native Mix: Bluebunch Wheatgrass, Basin Wildrye, Idaho Fescue, Indian Ricegrass, Big Bluegrass, Sandberg's Bluegrass, Sand Dropseed, Thickspike Wheatgrass, Needle & Thread, Yarrow, Arrowleaf Balsamroot, Lewis blue Flax, Evening Primrose, Red Phlox, Antelope Bitterbrush, , Introduced Mix: Intermediate Rush Wheatgrass, Vavilov Siberian Wheatgrass, Hycrest Crested Wheatgrass, Pryor Slender Wheatgrass, Potomic Orchardgrass
              •      . . . . . . C.6.f.3 Acres planted for erosion and sediment control 711.2
            •      . . . . C.6.h.1 Upland vegetation managementY (Y/N)
              •      . . . . . . C.6.h.2
                Species of plants in upland vegetation management
                Medusahead Rye, Cheatgrass, Ventenata; Juniperus occidentalis
              •      . . . . . . C.6.h.3 Acres treated for upland vegetation management 954.6
            •      . . . . C.6.j.1 Upland livestock management Y (Y/N)
              •      . . . . . . C.6.j.2 Upland livestock management action(s) taken (LOV)
              •      . . . . . . C.6.j.3 Upland acres managed for livestock 21.6
              •      . . . . . . C.6.j.4 Number of livestock water installations/developments 11