Snohomish R Confluence Reach Restoration

Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Acquisition

Instream Habitat Riparian Habitat
Project ID02-1623 R
Recovery DomainsPuget Sound
Start Date01/01/2004
End Date03/15/2008
Year2003
StatusCompleted
Last Edited05/01/2025
 
1 - 1

Description    


Snohomish County used this funding for a reach scale restoration effort, on three miles of the Snohomish River, downstream from the confluence of the Skykomish and Snoqualmie rivers. . Recognizing the importance of this area to Chinook salmon and other salmonids for spawning, rearing holding and migration, the Snohomish Basin Salmon Recovery forum identified it as a focus area in the Near Term Action Agenda (SBSRF, 2002).

The project used a phased approach, with activities at three different project sites, 1) Bob Heirmann Wildlife Park, 2) Twin Rivers Park and 3) Crabb Bend. We pursued the following activities:
• Planting with 12-15 ft. tall trees and cottonwood posts.
• Placement of LWD
• Construction of LWD complexes
• Reconnection of side channel
• Final design of dike breaches
The dike breach design work, placement of LWD, riprap removal, and side channel reconnection work is based on an analysis of the reach conducted by Snohomish County and included 2-D modeling of the reach.

During and following construction activities, two dikes in the area were analyzed for the position and magnitude of possible dike breaches. As luck would have it, during the November 2006 flood event on the Snohomish, one Dike breached in the location where the hydraulic model had predicted the maximum amount of sheer stress. Funding has since been secured to complete the dike breaching, which will eventually return much of the area to fully functioning riverine condition.

During the latter part of construction of the Twin Rivers side channel, an opportunity arose to assist with the installation of a substantial flood fence on the Skykomish River at Groeneveld Slough. Approximately 980 cottonwood boles were placed, and during the many high water events since that time, they have successfully withstood removal and have racked up a great deal of woody material, as designed

Project Benefit    


The goal of the project is to restore native riparian vegetation along salmon bearing streams. The objective of the project is to restore natural streamside vegetation, improve stream temperature, reduce erosion, filtration, and recruit large woody debris.

Accomplishments

Metric Completed Originally
Proposed
Instream Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated .05
Riparian Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated 1.65 .00
  Acres Treated 35.0 .0

Funding Details

SourceFunds
PCSRF$493,660
Other$122,913
Report Total:$616,573


Project Map



Worksites

1-Snohomish River Reach    


  • Worksite Identifier: 1-Snohomish River Reach
  • Start Date:
  • End Date:
Area Description

No Area Description data was found for this worksite.

Location Information

  • Basin: Puget Sound (171100)
  • Subbasin:
  • Watershed:
  • Subwatershed:
  • State: Washington
  • Recovery Domain: Puget Sound
  • Latitude: 47.86255847
  • Longitude: -122.08755837

ESU

  • Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia Coho Salmon ESU
  • Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia Chum Salmon ESU
  • Puget Sound Steelhead DPS
  • Puget Sound Chinook Salmon ESU

Map

Photos

Metrics

Metrics
  • C.0 Salmonid Habitat Restoration and AcquisitionY (Y/N)
    •      . . C.0.a Habitat restoration and acquisition funding 616,572.94
    •      . . C.0.b Length of stream treated/protected 1.60
    •      . . C.0.c
      Project identified in a Plan or Watershed Assessment
      Snohomish Basin Salmon Recovery Forum, December 2001, Snohomish River Basin Chinook Salmon Near Term Action Agenda 2002 Snohomish Salmon Recovery Technical Committee and Snohomish Forum in the Near-term Action Agenda as a “Focus Area” (Snohomish Basin Salmon Recovery Forum, December 2001, Snohomish River Basin Chinook Salmon Near Term Action Agenda), prior to the publication of the Snohomish River Basin Salmon Conservation Plan, (2005).
    •      . . C.0.d.1 Project Monitoring (LOV)
    •      . . C.0.d.2 Monitoring Location (LOV)
    •      . . C.4 Instream Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
      •      . . . . C.4.a Instream Habitat Funding 81,898.62
      •      . . . . C.4.b Total length of instream habitat treated .05
      •      . . . . C.4.c.1 Channel reconfiguration and connectivityY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.2 Type of change to channel configuration and connectivity (LOV)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.3 Miles of stream treated for channel reconfiguration and connectivity .05
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.4 Miles of off-channel stream created through channel reconfiguration and connectivity .05
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.5 Acres of off-channel or floodplain connected through channel reconfiguration and connectivity 2.5
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.6 Instream pools created/added through channel reconfiguration and connectivity 0
      •      . . . . C.4.d.1 Channel structure placementY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.2 Material used for channel structure (LOV)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.3 Miles of stream treated through channel structure placement .23
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.4 Acres of streambed treated through channel structure placement .5
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.5 Pools expected to be created through channel structure placement 1
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.7 Number of structures placed in channel 2
      •      . . C.5 Riparian Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . C.5.a Riparian Habitat Funding 534,674.32
        •      . . . . C.5.b.1 Total riparian miles streambank treated 1.65
        •      . . . . C.5.b.2 Total Riparian Acres Treated 35.0
        •      . . . . C.5.c.1 Riparian plantingY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.5.c.2
            Species of plants planted in riparian
            big-leaf maple Acer macrophyllum ACMA paper birch Betula papyrifera BEPA cascara Frangula purshiana FRPU black cottonwood Populus balsamifera POBA grand fir Abies grandis ABGR red alder Alnus rubra ALRU Douglas fir Psuedotsuga menziesii PSME S
          •      . . . . . . C.5.c.3 Acres planted in riparian 41.9
        •      . . . . C.5.h.1 Riparian plant removal/controlY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.5.h.2
            Species of plants treated/removed in riparian
            Cytisus scoparius Rubus armeniacus Polygonum cuspidatum, P. sachalinense, P. x bohemicum
          •      . . . . . . C.5.h.3 Acres of riparian treated for plant removal/control 35.0