Twisp River Nutrient Assessment II

Salmonid Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation (RM&E)

Monitoring
Project ID2009-4-04
Recovery DomainsUpper Columbia River
Start Date02/01/2010
End Date12/31/2012
Year2009
StatusCompleted
Last Edited01/26/2024
 
1 - 1

Description    


This project included monitoring of several restoration treatments, habitat complexity, nutrient enhancement and effect of non-native fish and listed fish species. Under this funding eight miles of stream was monitored, one mile of redd counts were monitored. The Habitat component (Hancock Springs) was treatment effectiveness, the nutrient and non-native components were pre-treatment monitoring only (as those treatments will take place in 2014 and 2016).

Benefits to Target Salmon Species: (Short description of the expected benefits to fish. Limit description to 1000 characters) The monitoring of separate and additive stream restoration methods are providing us with effectiveness data that will enable us to evaluate how specifically different life stages of listed salmonids are effected by restoration processes. This data will give us the criteria needed to prioritize a specific action when asking the question “what in-stream limiting factor is most affecting fish”.

Project Benefit    


Productivity for spring chinook and steelhead is exceeding low. With relatively intact and functional habitat, one explanation to extremely low freshwater production may be due to oligitrophication caused by declining returns of salmon derived nutrients. The proposed study would identify the magnitude and need for nutrient enhancement and is the first step in implementing a controlled nutrient enhancement program within the Methow Basin. Such a program has the potential to significantly increase productivity for all species of anadromous salmonids within the basin; increasing habitat capacity and ultimately abundance.

Accomplishments

Metric Completed Originally
Proposed
Research and Monitoring
  Stream Miles Monitored 8.00 20.60

Funding Details

SourceFunds
PCSRF$63,467
Report Total:$63,467


Project Map



Worksites

Twisp River    


  • Worksite Identifier: Twisp River
  • Start Date:
  • End Date:
Area Description

No Area Description data was found for this worksite.

Location Information

  • Basin: Upper Columbia (170200)
  • Subbasin: Methow
  • Watershed:
  • Subwatershed:
  • State: Washington
  • Recovery Domain: Upper Columbia River
  • Latitude: 48.4634
  • Longitude: -120.6001

ESU

  • Upper Columbia River Summer- and Fall-run Chinook Salmon ESU
  • Upper Columbia River Steelhead DPS
  • Upper Columbia River Spring-run Chinook Salmon ESU

Map

Photos

Metrics

Metrics
  • E.0 Salmonid Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation (RM&E)Y (Y/N)
    •      . . E.0.a RM&E Funding 63,467.00
    •      . . E.0.b
      Complement habitat restoration project
      Hancock Springs Restoration - BPA project
    •      . . E.0.c
      Project identified in a plan or watershed assessment.
      UC Biological Strategy and the UCRTT data gap analysis.
    •      . . E.0.d.1 Number of Cooperating Organizations 3
    •      . . E.0.d.2
      Name Of Cooperating Organizations.
      WDFW, USGS, CRITFC
    •      . . E.0.e.1 Number of reports prepared 8
    •      . . E.0.e.2
      Name Of Report
      PCSRF Semi-annual Progress Reports, 2010-2013.
    •      . . E.1 MonitoringY (Y/N)
      •      . . . . E.1.a Monitoring funding 63,467.00
      •      . . . . E.1.b.1 Stream Miles Monitored 8.00
      •      . . . . E.1.b.2 Acres of Watershed Area Monitored 20.0
      •      . . . . E.1.c.2 Salmonid smolt or fry monitoringY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . E.1.c.2.a # miles (to nearest 0.01 mile) monitored for Salmonid smolt or fry 8.00
      •      . . . . E.1.c.4 Redd countsY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . E.1.c.4.a # miles (to nearest 0.01 mile) monitored for redds 1.00
      •      . . . . E.1.c.13 Restoration effectiveness monitoringY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . E.1.c.13.a # miles (to nearest 0.01 mile) of stream or streambank monitored 1.00
        •      . . . . . . E.1.c.13.c # acres (to nearest 0.1 acre) monitored 2.0
        •      . . . . E.1.d
          Name Of Comprehensive Monitoring Strategy/Program
          none
        •      . . . . E.1.e
          Description of monitoring
          x