Hancock Springs Restoration Project II

Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Acquisition

Instream Habitat Riparian Habitat
Project ID2005-4-01
Recovery DomainsUpper Columbia River
Start Date01/01/2006
End Date05/31/2009
Year2005
StatusCompleted
Last Edited01/26/2024
 
1 - 1

Description    


This project was an extremely unique and successful project. It started as a shallow widened dammed indiscernible channel completed degraded from livestock that slowly evolved into a major steelhead spawning and rearing tributary in the upper Methow River drainage basin.

After identifying the potential natural production opportunities that Hancock Springs had to offer, a systematic restoration plan was employed. This plan included actions for narrowing the channel, adding hydraulic complexity through LWD and restoring riparian vegetation.

Narrowing the channel was accomplished through log and rock weir and baffle construction. Log and rock structures were put in place using hand tools. Structures were placed by excavating channel substrate and moving restoration material by hand. Construction of riffles and pools were also done using hand tools.

LWD was added in the form of root wads and small diameter logs. These pieces of wood added hydraulic complexity through pool scouring and cover.

Utilizing coir logs and mats we stabilized stream margins and disturbed wetted areas along the banks. This coir material allowed for sediment catching and plant growth.

Riparian restoration was accomplished through deer and cattle fencing along with plantings of different native vegetation.

Project Benefit    


The benefits of this project, as a whole, will be the restoration and protection of a critical environment that is essential to ESA listed salmonid spawning and rearing habitat, which in turn will play a major role in the efforts to restore viable salmon populations in the Mid Columbia River watersheds. As a possible acclimation site the restored spring will provide the means to rear and release juvenile salmonids. At this time there are no acclimation sites within the upper Methow Basin.

Accomplishments

Metric Completed Originally
Proposed
Instream Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated .80 .80
Riparian Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated 1.50 1.50
  Acres Treated 2.0 2.0

Funding Details

SourceFunds
PCSRF$117,913
Report Total:$117,913


Project Map



Worksites

Hancock Springs    


  • Worksite Identifier: Hancock Springs
  • Start Date: 10/21/2005
  • End Date: 12/31/2007
Area Description

No Area Description data was found for this worksite.

Location Information

  • Basin: Upper Columbia (170200)
  • Subbasin: Methow
  • Watershed:
  • Subwatershed:
  • State: Washington
  • Recovery Domain: Upper Columbia River
  • Latitude: 48.5297
  • Longitude: -120.3197

ESU

  • Upper Columbia River Steelhead DPS
  • Upper Columbia River Spring-run Chinook Salmon ESU

Map

Photos

Metrics

Metrics
  • C.0 Salmonid Habitat Restoration and AcquisitionY (Y/N)
    •      . . C.0.a Habitat restoration and acquisition funding 117,913.00
    •      . . C.0.b Length of stream treated/protected .75
    •      . . C.0.c
      Project identified in a Plan or Watershed Assessment
      Yakama Indian Nation, Upper Columbia River Basin Salmon Recovery Plan, Draft, Toppenish, WA: 20055
    •      . . C.0.d.1 Project Monitoring (LOV)
    •      . . C.0.d.2 Monitoring Location (LOV)
    •      . . C.0.d.3
      Monitoring text (from Phase I)
      A pre - post monitoring strategy was employed at Hancock Springs. Baseline conditions were surveyed before restoration activities began. This included hydraulic and biological monitoring with goal of evaluating the effectiveness of restoration activites. Channel conditions were surveyed, cross sections, thermal distribution, pebble counts flow and velocity measurements. Biological conditions consisted of water quality, BMI sampling and photo reference points in riparian zones.
    •      . . C.4 Instream Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
      •      . . . . C.4.a Instream Habitat Funding 72,913.00
      •      . . . . C.4.b Total length of instream habitat treated .80
      •      . . . . C.4.e.1 Streambank stabilization Y (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.e.2 Material Used For Streambank Stabilization (LOV)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.e.3 Miles of streambank stabilized .50
      •      . . C.5 Riparian Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . C.5.a Riparian Habitat Funding 45,000.00
        •      . . . . C.5.b.1 Total riparian miles streambank treated 1.50
        •      . . . . C.5.b.2 Total Riparian Acres Treated 2.0
        •      . . . . C.5.d.1 FencingY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.5.d.2 Miles of fence along stream 2.00
          •      . . . . . . C.5.d.3 Acres of riparian area protected by fencing 20.0
        •      . . . . C.5.h.1 Riparian plant removal/controlY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.5.h.2
            Species of plants treated/removed in riparian
            Canary Reed Grass and other invasive species
          •      . . . . . . C.5.h.3 Acres of riparian treated for plant removal/control .5