Meadow Creek Restoration Effectiveness Monitoring

Salmonid Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation (RM&E)

Monitoring
Project IDOWEB 220-8205-18696
Recovery DomainsSnake River
Start Date01/01/2020
End Date09/11/2024
Year2019
StatusCompleted
Last Edited05/02/2025
 
1 - 1

Description    


This project supported both short-term and long-term (> 10 years) monitoring of riparian vegetation (post stream restoration) of a ~ 11 km stretch of Meadow Creek within the Starkey Experimental Forest (SEFR). Data collected with this monitoring effort allowed us to (1) evaluate the separate and combined effects of cattle, elk and deer on growth, survival, and flowering of established riparian plantings; (2) complete monitoring of established planting responses (growth, survival, flowering) over high (~5.6-6.8 per km2; 2017-2019) and low elk densities (~ 0.75 – 1.0 per km2; 2021-2023), and compare planting height growth between low and high elk densities; (3) monitor grazing compliance metrics across four ungulate treatments (1. Cattle; 2. elk and deer; 3. Cattle, elk and deer; and 4. No ungulates) -including 3 years of pre-cattle grazing, and seven years of grazing thus far- that will allow for comparisons of compliance metrics between low-and-high density elk time periods and evaluation of grazing compliance metrics with long-term trends in riparian vegetation dynamics; (4) completed sampling of greenline vascular plant composition and woody vegetation cover, composition, and height distribution in 2021 and 2022; this data will be used to evaluate seven years of vegetation change across four ungulate treatments, along Meadow Creek, 7 and 8 years post restoration respectively; (4) and determine impacts of the separate and combined effects of cattle, and elk and deer on stream and greenline bryophyte (moss and liverworts; an overlooked riparian vegetation that is important aquatic invertebrate habitat in the Meadow Creek watershed) abundance across ungulate treatments.
Because the projects scheduled end date is after the PCSRF FFY 2019 award closes, no funds allocated for this project are reported as match to PCSRF funds.

Project Benefit    


A major benefit from effectiveness monitoring of this long-term restoration experiment is a well-documented set of cattle grazing practices and associated management tools of direct relevance to management of millions of acres of public range allotments where cattle grazing is a dominant land use and where salmonid recovery is a primary goal and riparian restoration is urgently needed. This set of grazing practices include those found to be effective on a practical scale in maintaining cattle use in upland areas and away from riparian areas to support salmonid restoration Results will be summarized annually for use by range and fisheries managers and the diverse set of stakeholders involved in grazing management.

In addition, research results will indicate what level of return a rancher (and salmon recovery) would receive from active strategies to maintain cattle in uplands through active herding and use of upland water and nutritional supplements. There will be economic analyses of the cost effectiveness of these practices and in relation to compliance with standards for greenline stubble height and streambank alternation. These results can be compared with the economic return of simply establishing exclusion fencing of the riparian area and the time required by range riders to monitor the exclusion fencing for breaches, which typically occur weekly throughout the grazing season, owing to both wild and domestic ungulate breaches, resulting in considerable effort to monitor and repair fences and herd trespass cows out of riparian areas. All of this information will be extremely useful for planning salmonid restoration projects on both public and private lands in making decisions on what approach grazing management (more intensive herd management vs. riparian exclusion) is more effective and cost-efficient.

Accomplishments

Metric Completed Originally
Proposed
Research and Monitoring
  Stream Miles Monitored 7.50

Funding Details

SourceFunds
State$32,239
In-Kind Donated Labor$15,000
Report Total:$47,239


Project Map



Worksites

60933507    


  • Worksite Identifier: 60933507
  • Start Date:
  • End Date:
Area Description

No Area Description data was found for this worksite.

Location Information

  • Basin: Lower Snake (170601)
  • Subbasin:
  • Watershed:
  • Subwatershed:
  • State: Oregon
  • Recovery Domain: Snake River
  • Latitude: 45.26363114
  • Longitude: -118.55999925

ESU

  • Snake River Basin Steelhead DPS
  • Snake River Spring/Summer-run Chinook Salmon ESU

Map

Photos

Metrics

Metrics
  • E.0 Salmonid Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation (RM&E)Y (Y/N)
    •      . . E.0.a RM&E Funding 47,238.62
    •      . . E.0.b
      Complement habitat restoration project
      Non OWEB grants that have occurred along Meadow Creek
    •      . . E.0.c
      Project identified in a plan or watershed assessment.
    •      . . E.0.d.1 Number of Cooperating Organizations 6
    •      . . E.0.d.2
      Name Of Cooperating Organizations.
      Oregon State University, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Nation, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Columbia River Inter-Tribal Commission
    •      . . E.0.e.1 Number of reports prepared 3
    •      . . E.0.e.2
      Name Of Report
      Livestock riparian guidelines may not promote woody species recovery where wild ungulate populations are high, Joshua P Averett, Michael J Wisdom, Bryan A Endress, 01/01/2019; Feed the bees and shade the streams: riparian shrubs planted for restoration provide forage for native bees, Scott R Mitchell, Sandra J DeBano, Mary M Rowland, Skyler Burrows, 03/01/2022; Modeling Riparian Use by Cattle – Influence of Management, Season, and Weather, Mary Rowland, Ryan M. Nielson, David W. Bohnert Ph.D., Bryan A. Endress Ph.D., Michael J. Wisdom Ph.D., Joshua P. Averett, 07/01/2023
    •      . . E.1 MonitoringY (Y/N)
      •      . . . . E.1.a Monitoring funding 47,238.62
      •      . . . . E.1.b.1 Stream Miles Monitored 7.50
      •      . . . . E.1.b.2 Acres of Watershed Area Monitored 5,315.0
      •      . . . . E.1.c.13 Restoration effectiveness monitoringY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . E.1.c.13.a # miles (to nearest 0.01 mile) of stream or streambank monitored 7.50
        •      . . . . . . E.1.c.13.c # acres (to nearest 0.1 acre) monitored 5,315.0
        •      . . . . E.1.d
          Name Of Comprehensive Monitoring Strategy/Program