Lower Coquille Restoration Effectiveness Monitoring

Salmonid Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation (RM&E)

Monitoring
Project IDOWEB 220-2057-17374
Recovery DomainsOregon Coast
Start Date04/22/2020
End Date09/08/2024
Year2019
StatusCompleted
Last Edited05/02/2025
 
1 - 1

Description    


The Lower Coquille Restoration Effectiveness Monitoring Project (LCREM) examined the effectiveness of two tide gate replacements and habitat restoration projects in the Coquille River (Coquille/Coos County). The project areas were historically freshwater tidal wetlands that were cleared, diked and drained for agricultural use, a fate typical of over-winter rearing habitat in the Coquille. LCREM is part of CoqWA’s overarching Lower Coquille Tide Gate and Fish Passage Monitoring Program, whose goal is to work collaboratively to examine the functionality of individual tide gate projects and how their compounded uplift promotes recovery of the Oregon Coast ESU coho population. This project conducted three years of water quality sampling, fish sampling and Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) tagging at the two project areas (located near river mile 13) and fish sampling and tagging in the Lower Coquille River. Salmonid movement was tracked by the installation of PIT antenna arrays on the two MTR tidegates at the project sites. The results were shared widely via written reports, in-person presentations and quarterly monitoring meetings.

Project Benefit    


The Oregon Coast has over a thousand tidegates and specifically the Coquille Valley contains over one hundred tidegates, many of which are failing. Many watershed councils along the Oregon Coast, including the Coquille Watershed Association, are optimizing tidegate replacements as “increasing overwinter rearing habitat is the top priority for ESU recovery” (ESA Recovery Plan for Oregon Coast Coho Salmon NMFS, 2016). Current tidegate replacement projects most often include restoration actions (e.g. channel construction and vegetation enhancements) for freshwater and saline tidal wetlands yet it is unknown how productive these restored wetlands are when located behind new MTR tidegates especially with respect to size of both tidegate installed and restored habitat. NMFS states in the ESA Recovery Plan for Oregon Coast Coho Salmon that a primary limiting factor affecting the Oregon Coast ESU coho recovery is overwinter rearing habitat specifically “connections to wetlands, backwater areas and complex floodplains”. Therefore, the importance of monitoring tidegate effectiveness is multifaceted and critical to improving the applied science of tideland restoration and tidegate upgrades and in turn all aspects benefit salmonids. In addition, by quantifying how much of an uplift the recent tidegate upgrades and habitat restoration projects have on the coho population of the Coquille Valley can in turn help inform future funders on the most beneficial actions and projects to take to recover Oregon Coast coho and other resources. Not only will an increase in habitat uplift be computed but the project will work to document changes in growth rate, survival and body condition based on restored estuarine-reared vs riverine-reared fish.
As noted in the Ecological Effects of Tidegate Upgrade or Removal (Souder, et al. 2018) “the information base on the effects of tidegate upgrades is limited.” Therefore, the results from our program will meet the needs identified in the ESA Recovery Plan for Oregon Coast Coho Salmon and Ecological Effects of Tidegate Upgrade or Removal and benefit the entire Oregon Coast in terms of providing critical and relevant information to agencies, landowners, and coastal communities on the effectiveness tidegate upgrades and tidal wetland restoration have on Oregon Coast ESU coho recovery.

Accomplishments

Metric Completed Originally
Proposed
Research and Monitoring
  Stream Miles Monitored 1.40

Funding Details

SourceFunds
State$166,890
Other$340,355
Report Total:$507,245


Project Map



Worksites

60933218    


  • Worksite Identifier: 60933218
  • Start Date:
  • End Date:
Area Description

No Area Description data was found for this worksite.

Location Information

  • Basin: Southern Oregon Coastal (171003)
  • Subbasin:
  • Watershed:
  • Subwatershed:
  • State: Oregon
  • Recovery Domain: Oregon Coast
  • Latitude: 43.13582283
  • Longitude: -124.29280273

ESU

  • Oregon Coast Coho Salmon ESU
  • Oregon Coast Chinook Salmon ESU

Map

Photos

Metrics

Metrics
  • E.0 Salmonid Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation (RM&E)Y (Y/N)
    •      . . E.0.a RM&E Funding 507,244.99
    •      . . E.0.b
      Complement habitat restoration project
      OWEB Project(s):219-2007-16371, 211-115, 218-2998-16433
    •      . . E.0.c
      Project identified in a plan or watershed assessment.
    •      . . E.0.d.1 Number of Cooperating Organizations 4
    •      . . E.0.d.2
      Name Of Cooperating Organizations.
      ODFW REDD Group, ODFW Charleston Field Office, ODFW The Dalles Research Station, USFWS Bandon Marsh National Wildlife Refuge
    •      . . E.0.e.1 Number of reports prepared 3
    •      . . E.0.e.2
      Name Of Report
      Lower Coquille Tide Gate and Fish Passage Monitoring Project - Year 1, Jamie Anthony , Julie Huff, Chris Claire, Derrek Faber, Gary Vonderohe, December 1 2021; Lower Coquille Tide Gate and Fish Passage Monitoring Project – Year 2, Jamie Anthony , Julie Huff, Chris Claire, Derrek Faber, Gary Vonderohe, Morgan Davies, December 1 2022; Lower Coquille Tide Gate and Fish Passage Monitoring Project – Year 3, Jamie Anthony , Julie Huff, Chris Claire, Ed Hughes, Derrek Faber, Melaney Dunne, Randi Navarro, January 1 2024
    •      . . E.1 MonitoringY (Y/N)
      •      . . . . E.1.a Monitoring funding 507,244.99
      •      . . . . E.1.b.1 Stream Miles Monitored 1.40
      •      . . . . E.1.b.2 Acres of Watershed Area Monitored 17.0
      •      . . . . E.1.c.13 Restoration effectiveness monitoringY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . E.1.c.13.a # miles (to nearest 0.01 mile) of stream or streambank monitored 1.40
        •      . . . . . . E.1.c.13.c # acres (to nearest 0.1 acre) monitored 17.0
        •      . . . . E.1.d
          Name Of Comprehensive Monitoring Strategy/Program