Tucannon Ranch River Reach Design/Feasibility
Salmonid Restoration Planning and Assessments
|
09-1595 P | Snake River | 12/10/2009 | 12/10/2011 | 2008 | Completed | 05/01/2025 | |
| |
Description
This project developed a comprehensive plan to restore salmonid habitat along 3.8 miles of the Tucannon River from RM 0.7 to 4.5 (idenified as Reach 2 by Anchor QEA, 2011). The project also partially funded a LIDAR survey and analysis of 51 miles of the Tucannon River, beginning at the rivers mouth. Dikes within the town of Starbuck, just above the project area for the comprehensive plan, confine the river resulting in enhanced bedload movement. The resulting bedload buildup down river led to chronic flooding of agricultural fields and short-term filling of critical salmon habitat which adversely impacted irrigation infrastructure. Understanding the channel processes that are causing these circumstances is critical to successful restoration efforts. This project identified alternatives to preserve the interests of both fish and farmers. The reach is utilized by 4 ESA listed species, including Fall Chinook (spawning & rearing); Spring Chinook (migration); Steelhead (spawning, rearing, migration and overwintering); and bull trout (overwintering & migration). This project developed a long-term strategy to improve salmon habitat and consider other stakeholder interests, including flood management and agricultural productivity. Management activities identified thru this project included instream habitat enhancement by LWD placement, enhancement/stabilization of floodplain function, off-set dikes and/or conservation easements. Project deliverables included: conceptual reach design, 30% design from one developed concept, assessment report documenting LIDAR images, flow patterns, hydrology, cross-section, & priority actions. The Tucannon River is primarily a single thread channel that meanders through a relatively low lying, vegetated riparian corridor. Although historically the floodplain and riparian area were likely more expansive and complex, the present day condition of the river is limited by human infrastructure that controls the channel position. Presently there are multiple rock weirs, barbs, levees and spoil pile berms that control the grade, limit channel migration and interrupt the natural floodplain process. Additional infrastructure such as buildings and agricultural land irrigated by pivot systems, physically limit the extent of restoration possibilities.
Project Benefit
The goal of the project is to increase/improve information to help select projects that have a high certainty and benefit. The objective of the project is to determine project siting, feasibility, design, or implementation.
Accomplishments
Planning and Assessment |
Stream Miles Assessed |
51.00 |
51.00 |
Funding Details |
State | $178,951 |
Other | $49,416 |
Report Total: | $228,368 |
|
| |
Worksites
1-Tucannon Ranch
- Worksite Identifier: 1-Tucannon Ranch
- Start Date:
- End Date:
Area Description
No Area Description data was found for this worksite.
Location Information
- Basin: Lower Snake (170601)
- Subbasin:
- Watershed:
- Subwatershed:
- State: Washington
- Recovery Domain: Snake River
- Latitude: 46.52291986
- Longitude: -118.13911356
ESU
- Snake River Basin Steelhead DPS
- Snake River Spring/Summer-run Chinook Salmon ESU
- Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon ESU
Map
Photos
Metrics
Metrics
- B.0
Salmonid Restoration Planning and AssessmentsY (Y/N)
- . . B.0.a
Planning And Assessment Funding 228,368.00
- . . B.0.b.1
Area Encompassed 3.8
- . . B.1
Restoration Planning And CoordinationY (Y/N)
- . . . . B.1.a
Planning and Coordination funding 59,857.00
- . . . . B.1.b.11
Engineering/design work for restoration projectsY (Y/N)
- . . . . . . B.1.b.11.a
Name of plan implemented | |
Anchor QEA, 2011a. Tucannon R Geomorphic Assessment & Habitat Restoration Study. Prepared for Columbia Cons Dist.
Anchor QEA, 2011b. 30% Design Report, Tucannon R Geomorphic Assessment & Habitat Restoration Study. Prepared for Columbia Cons Dist. |
- . . . . . . B.1.b.11.b
Description and scope of the plan implemented | |
The scope of the plan was to identify/strengthen the technical understanding of historical and existing physical conditions and geomorphic processes within the basin (general assessment) that contribute to conditions and geomorphic processes impacting the Focus Reach (Reach 2, Anchor QEA 2011) to identify and prioritize habitat restoration actions and complete a 30% design of Reach 2 actions that lead to or contribute to natural process enhancement with consideration of landowner operations.
Understanding the existing basin system is critical to developing restoration actions to improve habitat conditions for ESA listed and non listed species within the basin. Strategies and recommendations were developed based on habitat limiting factors identified in the Tucannon Subbasin Plan (CCD 2004) and Snake River Salmon Recovery Plan (SRSRB 2006), salmonid life history, site specific physical, hydrologic and geomorphic conditions. Restoration framework was loosely based on the Roni et al. process and addresses the 5 characteristics, 1) Protect and maintain natural processes, 2)Connect disconnected habitats, 3)Address roads, levees and other human infrastructure impairing processes, 4) Restore riparian processes and 5) Improve instream habitats.
This project effort was expanded throughout the basin with funding provided thru BPA with an additional 30 river miles (Reach 6-10, Anchor QEA 2011) completed, identifying and prioritizing 28 projects & 30% design for 1 additional project. |
- . . B.2
Salmonid Habitat Assessment / InventoryY (Y/N)
- . . . . B.2.a
Habitat Assessment Funding 168,511.00
- . . . . B.2.c
Instream SurveyY (Y/N)
- . . . . . . B.2.c.1
Type of instream survey (LOV)
- . . . . . . B.2.c.2
Stream miles assessed 51.00
- . . . . . . B.2.c.3
Stream miles assessed that contained salmonids 51.00
- . . . . . . B.2.c.4
Stream miles assessed that needed restoration 51.00
- . . . . . . B.2.c.5
Stream miles assessed for regulatory actions .00
- . . . . . . B.2.c.6
Fish passage impediments identified 0
|
|