Meacham Creek - Bonifer Reach Floodplain Connectivity II

Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Acquisition

Instream Habitat Riparian Habitat Wetland
Project ID16-Umat-02
Recovery DomainsInterior Columbia
Start Date05/01/2017
End Date12/18/2017
Year2016
StatusCompleted
Last Edited10/21/2021
 
1 - 1

Description    


The PCSRF funds were used specifically for the excavation of the new side channel habitat which resulted in the creation of .18 miles of off-channel stream creation and for 25 acres of off-channel area to be connected. Using non-PCSRF funding sources, 13.4 acres were planted and .1 acres of wetland was treated and .04 acres of wetland was created. Work was completed outside of the work window and within the ordinary high water during the fall of 2017 so the project was completed sooner than expected.

Project Benefit    


Over the last 150 years, much of the Meacham Creek watershed has been negatively impacted by road construction, agriculture and livestock grazing, the Union Pacific Railroad and other human activities. Direct channelization and the construction of levees and spur dikes also occurred in Meacham Creek following the 1964 flood, which have altered natural hydrologic and geomorphic processes that shape the form and function of Meacham Creek. Channel sinuosity has greatly decreased from historic conditions from 1916 to present. The decrease in sinuosity corresponds with the construction of levees and spurs dikes and a loss of valley floor width from the railroad encroachment. As a result of extensive levees, spur dikes, cattle grazing, and other impacts, Meacham Creek is subject to problems associated with decreased floodplain connectivity, degraded channel structure, limited large wood and sources, altered hydrology and sediment transport, poor riparian cover and conditions, and elevated water temperatures and rate of heating. Key in limiting salmonid fish production, these watershed impacts led to high stream temperatures, lack of summer flow, limited floodplain connectivity, lack of overall habitat complexity and side-channel habitat, and limited in-stream shade and cover. Specifically identified primary limiting factors for the Meacham Creek watershed include in-channel characteristics, floodplain/riparian, sediment, and water quality – temperature. Each of these factors limiting fish production has contributed toward Middle Columbia River steelhead and Columbia River Basin bull trout that are present in the Meacham Creek watershed being federally listed as threatened under the ESA of 1973, as modified.

Habitat enhancement in the upper Umatilla focus area, and specifically in Meacham Creek, is expected to reduce summer stream temperatures, improve overall channel and floodplain stability, and ultimately improve aquatic habitat conditions. The CTUIR natural resource staff expects measurable response in key characteristics of hydrology, geomorphology, and connectivity resulting in improved riparian vegetation conditions and improved conditions for important aquatic species. Specifically, proposed actions are expected to improve connectivity between surface flow and shallow groundwater in the channel and floodplain, and the riparian forest. This will result in cooler in-stream water due to the influence of increased hyporheic interaction. We expect to observe increases in the incidence of cold water refuge areas for salmonids (e.g. pools and reaches downstream of meander bends or islands). Adverse impacts associated with the implementation actions are expected to be temporary and insignificant when compared to the expected long-term benefits to the upper Umatilla focus area ecosystem.

The future management of these project areas will remain the same as they are currently. The CTUIR owns most of the project areas with some individual allotments interspersed. Since the purchase of the property, the only livestock grazing that has been permitted is the use of goats to control invasive plant species. Furthermore, there is a fence running the full length of the railroad right-of-way to prevent trespass cattle grazing.

Accomplishments

Metric Completed Originally
Proposed
Instream Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated .45 .45
Wetland Habitat
  Acres Created .0 4.8
  Acres Treated .1 5.0
Riparian Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated .95 .95
  Acres Treated 25.0 52.0

Funding Details

SourceFunds
PCSRF$55,000
Other$165,570
Report Total:$220,570


Project Map



Worksites

Meacham Creek - Bonifer Reach    


  • Worksite Identifier: Meacham Creek - Bonifer Reach
  • Start Date: 05/01/2017
  • End Date: 12/31/2018
Area Description

No Area Description data was found for this worksite.

Location Information

  • Basin: Middle Columbia
  • Subbasin:
  • Watershed:
  • Subwatershed:
  • State: Oregon
  • Recovery Domain: Interior Columbia
  • Latitude: 45.68581
  • Longitude: -118.36424

ESU

  • Mid-Columbia River Spring-run Chinook Salmon ESU
  • Middle Columbia River Steelhead DPS

Map

Photos

Metrics

Metrics
  • C.0 Salmonid Habitat Restoration and AcquisitionY (Y/N)
    •      . . C.0.a Habitat restoration and acquisition funding 220,570.00
    •      . . C.0.b Length of stream treated/protected .95
    •      . . C.0.c
      Project identified in a Plan or Watershed Assessment
      (1) Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish-Wit: Spirit of the Salmon (CRITFC, 2013) Goals and Objectives in Volume 1, page 11 + 4 more (contact CRITFC for full list, as it would not fit here)
    •      . . C.0.d.1 Project Monitoring (LOV)
    •      . . C.0.d.2 Monitoring Location (LOV)
    •      . . C.4 Instream Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
      •      . . . . C.4.a Instream Habitat Funding 170,491.00
      •      . . . . C.4.b Total length of instream habitat treated .45
      •      . . . . C.4.c.1 Channel reconfiguration and connectivityY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.2 Type of change to channel configuration and connectivity (LOV)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.3 Miles of stream treated for channel reconfiguration and connectivity .00
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.4 Miles of off-channel stream created through channel reconfiguration and connectivity .18
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.5 Acres of off-channel or floodplain connected through channel reconfiguration and connectivity 25.0
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.6 Instream pools created/added through channel reconfiguration and connectivity 0
      •      . . C.5 Riparian Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . C.5.a Riparian Habitat Funding 37,579.00
        •      . . . . C.5.b.1 Total riparian miles streambank treated .95
        •      . . . . C.5.b.2 Total Riparian Acres Treated 25.0
        •      . . . . C.5.c.1 Riparian plantingY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.5.c.2
            Species of plants planted in riparian
            Douglas Maple (Acer glabrum), Thinleaf Alder (Alnus incana), Serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia), Water Birch (Betula occidentalis), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus sericea), Black Hawthorn (Cretageus douglasi), Cascara (Frangula purshiana), Oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor), Mockorange (Philadelphus lewisii), Mallow Ninebark (Physocarpus malvaceus), Ponderosa Pine (Pinus ponderosa), Aspen (Populus tremuloides), Black Cottonwood (Populus trichocharpa), Willow spp. (Salix spp.), Bittercherry (Prunus emarginata), Chokecherry (Prunus virginiana), Golden Current (Ribes aureum), Nootka Rose (Rosa nutkana), Woods Rose (Rosa woodsia), Blue Elderberry (Sambucus nigra cerulean), Western Spirea (Spiraea douglasii), Snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus) and Golden banner (Thermopsis montana).
          •      . . . . . . C.5.c.3 Acres planted in riparian 13.4
          •      . . . . . . C.5.c.4 Miles of streambank treated with riparian planting 1.80
        •      . . . . C.5.h.1 Riparian plant removal/controlY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . . . C.5.h.2
            Species of plants treated/removed in riparian
            Common bugloss (Anchusa officinalis), Spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe), Diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa), Dalmation toadflax (Linaria dalmatica), Viper’s bugloss (Echium vulgare L.), Himalayan Blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), and Whitetop (C.p.)
          •      . . . . . . C.5.h.3 Acres of riparian treated for plant removal/control 79.0
          •      . . . . . . C.5.h.4 Miles of streambank treated for riparian plant removal/control 1.80
        •      . . C.8 Wetland ProjectY (Y/N)
          •      . . . . C.8.a Wetland funding 12,500.00
          •      . . . . C.8.b Total acres of wetland area treated .1
          •      . . . . C.8.e.1 Wetland improvement/restorationY (Y/N)
            •      . . . . . . C.8.e.2 Acres of wetland treated .1
          •      . . . . C.8.f.1 Artificial wetland createdY (Y/N)
            •      . . . . . . C.8.f.2 Artificial wetland acres created .0