Larson’s Reach Phase 2 Instream Restoration

Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Acquisition

Instream Habitat
Project ID13-LUMM-01
Recovery DomainsPuget Sound
Start Date08/01/2013
End Date12/31/2015
Year2013
StatusCompleted
Last Edited01/25/2024
 
1 - 1

Description    


The reported actual metrics are substantially lower than the proposed because the proposed metrics represented the project in its entirety, i.e. inclusive of all funding sources. The actual metrics now reflect the contributions from NWIFC PCSRF relative to the entire project cost approximately $1.9M, which equates to NWIFC reporting less than 10% of the performance metrics. This prorating needed to occur since the RCO agreement also had a PCSRF component of funding. The NWIFC funding component ($177,000) is represented in the RCO agreement $352,000 sponsor match. Dialogue has occurred between the Lummi Nation project manager, RCO project managers, and NWIFC’s project coordinator to ensure that metric reporting would not result in duplication.

The prorated metrics reported with this project include 2 engineered logjams to restore habitat in the South Fork Nooksack River. Additional prorated metrics include: 1) Creating 0.3 primary pool habitat units in cool water refuge areas. 2) Increasing floodplain and side channel connectivity through excavation and placement of engineered logjams to provide up to 0.1 miles of off channel rearing habitat 3) Increasing habitat quality and diversity by creating 2 primary pool habitat units, and 4) Increasing the acreage (3.6) of off-channel habitat connected to the floodplain.


Project Benefit    


The goal of the Larson’s Reach Phase 2 project is to restore salmonid spawning, rearing and holding habitat in order to recover self-sustaining salmonid runs to harvestable levels by addressing limiting factors of temperature and habitat diversity and quantity in the reach. Endangered early spring Chinook salmon and bull trout will benefit from 2.1 primary pools; more pools may develop indirectly as increased roughness causes dynamic equilibrium. Scour pools provide thermal refugia (holding pools) from elevated South Fork water temperatures during summer spawning months in addition to pools for juvenile overwintering (rearing pools). In addition, juveniles will benefit from 0.1 miles of off channel rearing habitat by increasing connectivity with the floodplain and side channels. All features are focused on enhancement of endangered Spring Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) habitat by maximizing natural habitat-forming processes inherent in this reach of river.

Accomplishments

Metric Completed Originally
Proposed
Instream Habitat
  Stream Miles Treated .10 1.60

Funding Details

SourceFunds
PCSRF$177,000
Report Total:$177,000


Project Map



Worksites

Larsons Reach    


  • Worksite Identifier: Larsons Reach
  • Start Date: 07/01/2013
  • End Date: 12/31/2014
Area Description
South Fork Nooksack River

Location Information

  • Basin: Puget Sound (171100)
  • Subbasin:
  • Watershed:
  • Subwatershed:
  • State: Washington
  • Recovery Domain: Puget Sound
  • Latitude: 48.608949
  • Longitude: -122.083991

ESU

  • Puget Sound Chinook Salmon ESU
  • Puget Sound Steelhead DPS

Map

Photos

Metrics

Metrics
  • C.0 Salmonid Habitat Restoration and AcquisitionY (Y/N)
    •      . . C.0.a Habitat restoration and acquisition funding 177,000.00
    •      . . C.0.b Length of stream treated/protected .10
    •      . . C.0.c
      Project identified in a Plan or Watershed Assessment
      1. WRIA 1 Salmon Recovery Board. 2005. Water Resource Inventory Area 1 (WRIA) Salmonid Habitat Restoration Strategy 100pp. 2. Brown, M. and M. Maudlin. 2007. Upper South Fork Habitat Assessment. Report to SRFB, Olympia, WA. IAC# 04-1487N. 156pp 3. Maudlin, M. and T. Coe. 2011. Effectiveness Monitoring of South Fork Nooksack Instream Habitat Projects, Summer 2011. December 19, 2001. Nooksack Tribe, Natural Resources Department. Deming, WA. 43 pp.
    •      . . C.0.d.1 Project Monitoring (LOV)
    •      . . C.0.d.2 Monitoring Location (LOV)
    •      . . C.4 Instream Habitat ProjectY (Y/N)
      •      . . . . C.4.a Instream Habitat Funding 177,000.00
      •      . . . . C.4.b Total length of instream habitat treated .10
      •      . . . . C.4.c.1 Channel reconfiguration and connectivityY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.2 Type of change to channel configuration and connectivity (LOV)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.3 Miles of stream treated for channel reconfiguration and connectivity .10
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.4 Miles of off-channel stream created through channel reconfiguration and connectivity .10
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.5 Acres of off-channel or floodplain connected through channel reconfiguration and connectivity 3.6
        •      . . . . . . C.4.c.6 Instream pools created/added through channel reconfiguration and connectivity 2
      •      . . . . C.4.d.1 Channel structure placementY (Y/N)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.2 Material used for channel structure (LOV)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.3 Miles of stream treated through channel structure placement .10
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.4 Acres of streambed treated through channel structure placement .1
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.5 Pools expected to be created through channel structure placement 2
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.6 Yards of average stream-width at mid-point of channel structure placement project3 (Yards)
        •      . . . . . . C.4.d.7 Number of structures placed in channel 2